“Sleight of Hand Two Pakistani tricksters employed sleight of hand at various shops and hotels island wide last year to steal money from unknowing cashiers. One of them would take money from the cashier using an excuse while the other distracted the cashier. The money would then be returned to the cashier but with some cash missing. They would leave the shop before the cashier could finish counting the notes.” Extracted from the Singapore police force
These two Pakistani managed to pass through the customs without being detected. As seen from the re-enactment, both were very smartly dressed, cultured n refined. One would make up an excuse to take money from the cashier while the other distracts the cashier. They employed the same technique to many unsuspecting cashiers over a very short period of time. However, the two were eventually arrested at the Causeway.
All victims described the tricksters as smartly dressed. In my opinion, these tricksters were indeed intelligent. Everything was well planned and probably well rehearsed before execution. They were able to allow their victims lower their guard by creating a perception of a genuine tourist and collector and convince the victims in handing over the cash. The same technique was employed repeatedly after realizing that it was workable (Pragmatic approach). The success of the tricksters also lies in the use of nonverbal cues. Mainly Paralinguistics and Oculesics. For instance, calm, soothing and steady voice (Paralinguistics) as well as constantly maintaining suitable eye contact (Oculesics). Amazingly, communication is not only an extremely vital tool in the public relation industry but also in committing crimes.
If I were in the culprits’ shoes, I would have applied a different approach. I wouldn’t have maintained the same appearance or the same outfit for the subsequent crimes. Most importantly, I would not even have driven a car. A car will definitely leave traces and that is as good as turning myself in.
I know what is on your mind, do not change your perception of me; I’m not a thief! Even though I think the life of a thief is certainly more enriching and exciting as compared to a regular policeman. But I must admit that I do use these ‘arsenals of weapon’ sometimes. And I think you’re not much different from me, correct me if I’m wrong, we do rely on these ‘weapons’ in some point in our lives to get what we desire, don’t we?